Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEAT: Draft_filtersolutions #4745

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ramin4667
Copy link
Contributor

[feat/drfat_filtersolutions] This new feature adds a draft release of FilterSolutions API to pyaedt platform.

@ramin4667 ramin4667 requested a review from myoung301 May 30, 2024 16:25
@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@github-actions github-actions bot added examples enhancement New features or code improvements labels May 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 24.22164% with 1436 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.14%. Comparing base (0d099fb) to head (2c223b3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4745      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.14%   81.14%   -2.01%     
==========================================
  Files         118      130      +12     
  Lines       54075    55970    +1895     
==========================================
+ Hits        44959    45415     +456     
- Misses       9116    10555    +1439     

@myoung301 myoung301 changed the title Feat/draft filtersolutions FEAT: Draft_filtersolutions May 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@myoung301 myoung301 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't reviewed all files yet, but had some initial comments. I would also like to get input from some of the other PyAEDT contributors before we continue.

@maxcapodi78 or @MaxJPRey - can you review this draft PR and give your preliminary feedback before we proceed to polish the finer details?

@myoung301
Copy link
Contributor

@Samuelopez-ansys who would be the right person to review this PR? It's still a draft and we will have more to refine, but wanted initial feedback on this draft.

@myoung301
Copy link
Contributor

@Samuelopez-ansys I am looking for an architecture/design-level review while this is still a draft. The comments so far have been cosmetic. We'll work to address all the cosmetic issues, but some of that could be premature if any substantial architectural changes are needed (large amounts of code to add/remove/move).

@Samuelopez-ansys
Copy link
Member

@myoung301 Ok I see. I will review the code on Monday then.

@Samuelopez-ansys
Copy link
Member

@ramin4667 Please mark as resolved the conversations, if you fixed them.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the examples label Jun 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the examples Anything related to the examples label Jun 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@myoung301 myoung301 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly adjustments to the doc strings but some things to look at in the tests and the version code as well.

@myoung301 myoung301 mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2024
@myoung301 myoung301 closed this Jun 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New features or code improvements examples Anything related to the examples
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants